M.V. Kamath has raised some questions in his article "Raising the Value of Muslim Indians in Politics" (Organiser, 13 July, 1997).

Muslim Indians, given a chance, are learning English, Hindi and all useful languages. But in order to maintain their religious identity, they are also learning to read Arabic and about essentials of Islam.

Muslim Indians do not have to change food habits, since majority of Hindus are non-vegetarians and very, very few are so rigid as to refuse a cordial invitation only because non-vegetarian dishes may also be served. Of course a good Muslim host would not serve any beef product out of deference for the religious sensitivities of his guest.

Yes, Muslims do, should and will, participate in celebrating Hindu festivals, short of joining in Puja, but this has to be a reciprocal gesture.

A Muslim Indian, as an Indian, lives the Indian culture. Hindu culture may be its core, its bedrock, but, all said and done, is only one element, not the whole. As an Indian, he is equally proud of Buddha and Ashoka. He respects the universal elements of the Vedas. Iqbal translated the Gayatri Mantra. But respect and tolerance must also be mutual.

Both Muslim and Hindu Indians have to adjust to each others as neither can wish the other way. What is much more important is that while Muslim Indians play their due role in national politics, the national leadership which is largely Hindu be responsive to the legitimate grievances and aspirations, of Muslim Indians? Will the non-Muslim legislators take up their problems, articulate them and seek official intervention and suggest remedial measures?

It is not important that a Muslim Indian be elected as the Prime Minister. A Muslim President or Vice President made no difference. What is important is whether Muslim Indian will be heard with sympathy and receive a purposeful and effective response?                                                                                                             (A Letter to the Organiser, 7 September, 1997)