Total : 411 Muslims : 15 Percentage : 3.7
1. Syed Sabahat Azim
2. Mohd. Ghulam Ali Ansari
3. Mohd. Salman Khan
4. Zubair Riaz Kamili
5. Faisal Imam
6. S. Anwar Hussain
7. Syed Abdul Rahman
8. Ghayas Uddin Ahmed
9. Zafar Azam ..
10. Hafiz Mohamed
11. Mohd. Israr Khan
12. Shahnawaz Qasim
13. P.B. Salim
14. Rafique Ahmad
15. K.K. Ashraf
Hamdard Study Circle: Coaching Results, 1999
S.No. UPSC Rank Name State Community Category
1 25 S. Sabahat Azim UP Muslim Gen.
2 70 Md. G. Ali Ansari Bihar Muslim OBC
3 97 Zubair Riaz Kamili J&K Muslim Gen.
4 155 Gloria Gaugte Manipur Christian ST
5 175 S. Anwar Hussain Karnataka Muslim Gen.
6 214 S. Abdul Rahman Bihar Muslim Gen.
7 221 Navjyoti Gogoi Assam Hindu OBC
8 244 Shahnawaz Qasim Bihar Muslim Gen.
9 304 Mohd. Israr Khan UP Muslim OBC
10 316 Ghayasuddin Ahmad UP Muslim OBC
11 322 P.B. Salim Kerala Muslim OBC
12 341 Sanjay M. Kaul Gujarat Hindu OBC
13 387 M.S. Sunil T.N. Hindu SC
Break-up of Selected Candidates
State-wise
UP 3
Tamilnadu 1
Karnataka 1
J&K 1
Gujarat 1
Bihar 3
Kerala 1
Assam 1
Manipur 1
Community-wise
Muslims 9
Christians 1
Hindus 3
Category-Wise
OBC 6
SC 1
General 5
ST 1
Muslims 9
Non-Muslims 4
% of Total Selected 69%
% of Non-Muslims among 31%
Hamdard Candidates
No Muslim among 14 Major-Generals Promoted
The ... Army headquarters (has) released a list of 14 Major Generals who will be promoted to the next higher rank of a Lieutenant General ... The 14 officers approved for empaneiment are: Major Generals O S Lohchab, R M Chaddha, T S (Mao) Shergill, Mahesh Vij, Arjun Ray, J R Mukherjec, Kapil Vij, V K Kapoor, A Chaki, J S Varma, J J Singh, J B S Yadav, Hari Prasad and S B Satpute .... (Source: The Indian Express, 8 June, 2000)
Supreme Court On Reservation in Judiciary
State of Bihar and another, Appellants v. Bal Mukund Sah and others, Respondents.
S.B. MAJMUDAR, G.B. PATTANAIK, V.N. KHARE, U.C. BANERJEE AND R.P. SETHI, JJ.
Constitution of India, Articles16(4), 335 Reservation for backward classes – Enabling power under Article 16(4) – Subject to constitutional limitation of "efficiency of administration" - Maintenance of efficiency in judicial administration - Is within exclusive purview of High Court - High Court has to be consulted before making reservation in subordinate judiciary.
Articles 16(4), 233, 234, 309 – Bihar Reservation of Vacancies in Posts and Services ( for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act 1991), Section 41 - Reservation in judicial service - Only after consultation with High Court – Constitutional scheme under Articles 233, 234 and concept of independent judiciary mandates this - Section 4 of Bihar act enacted under Article 309 providing for reservation cannot operate so far as appointments to District and Subordinate Judiciary are concerned and is ultra vires to that extent ...
Articles 233, 234, 16(4), 320(4) Appointment - District and subordinate judiciary- Consultation with High Court - Scope of, cannot be equated with that of consultation with service commission - Saying that policy of reservation in appointments would be outside scope of consultation with High Court by equating consultations with the two constitutional functionaries - Is not proper. (Source: AIR 2000 Supreme Court 1296)
|
Reservation for Protection against Majoritarian Communalism The governing class has obtained its power by the same system of reservations which it is now opposing on the ground of communalism ... ... In asking for reservations the servile classes are not asking for anything new or anything extraordinary. The demand for reservation is a demand for protection against the aggressive communalism of the governing class, which wants to dominate the servile class in all fields of life and without imposing on the governing class any such ignominious conditions. - B.R. Ambedkar |
